Most Shared

BREAKING NEWS:

BREAKING NEWS:

ABC 6 - Search Results

The following is an archived video story. The text content of that video story is available below for reference. The original video has been deleted and is no longer available.

Facility in W.Va Spill Flew Under Regulatory Radar

CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) -- The facility whose chemical spill contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginia residents was barely scrutinized, flying largely under the radar of government regulators who viewed it as a low-risk operation - but in reality, a problem at a key holding wall went undetected and unreported at Freedom Industries Inc.

The chemicals stored at Freedom's facility near the Elk River are not considered hazardous enough by regulators to prompt routine inspections. As a result, the chemical storage terminal was a low priority for regulators, who must pick and choose how to allocated scarce manpower when enforcing environmental laws.

"I think that the loophole that this facility fell into is because it was not a hazardous material, it flew under the radar," said Randy Huffman, cabinet secretary of West Virginia's Department of Environmental Protection, which enforces environmental laws.

Freedom's storage terminal holds millions of pounds of chemicals - including some used in coal processing - just a mile and a half upstream from pipes that take in water for a public drinking supply. The distance left little opportunity for chemicals to dilute in the event of a spill.

And those chemicals were stored behind a brick-and-concrete block dike that seems to have had structural problems - an issue the company apparently was aware of. A state official says the president told regulators that Freedom had put $1 million into an escrow account to fix the wall that ultimately failed to hold Thursday's spill, which resulted in a five-day ban on tap water. The ban was lifted for some areas Monday afternoon.

State environmental officials would not have seen the dike problems - they say they never had reason to inspect the site.

The situation at Freedom is probably not unique. On paper, the chemical storage terminal in West Virginia - like similar sites nationwide - simply did not fall into any inspection program, authorities said. Neither the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency nor the state DEP sent inspectors before the spill, agency officials said.

Because the site only stored and did not manufacture chemicals, it did not need permits to discharge pollutants into the air or water. It was not cited for any environmental violations, according to a federally run database. West Virginia officials last visited the property in 1991, when it was an refinery owned by a different company and operating under more stringent rules, DEP spokesman Tom Aluise said. Freedom didn't buy the property until last month.

Officials at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration once scheduled an inspection in 2009, then canceled it after realizing the company did not fall under any of its special emphasis programs, OSHA spokesman Jesse Lawder said.

Although regulators never visited, it appears company officials were aware of issues with the containment dike. Freedom Industries President Gary Southern told state regulators that $1 million was put into an escrow account to repair the wall, said Mike Dorsey, the DEP's director of emergency response and homeland security. Company officials have not returned calls seeking comment on the condition of the dike.

"The wall is an old cement block wall, and there's some problems with the mortar in a couple places," Dorsey told The Associated Press. "And it came out through that."

On an average day last year, the facility was keeping anywhere from about 11.4 million to nearly 63.5 million pounds of chemicals in above-ground storage tanks and at least one warehouse, according to an inventory sheet filed with state regulators in February 2013. The AP obtained those inventories using West Virginia's open-records law.

Experts say the chemicals found on site are common to many industrial operations and not considered extremely hazardous, though they are harmful if swallowed and can cause skin and eye irritation. They can be used to prevent dust buildups or treat drinking water, or they can be used in personal cosmetics.

"The chemicals on this list would not be chemicals where a red flag would go up and people would be extra cautious to ensure this is housed safely," said Rolf Halden, director of the Center For Environmental Security at Arizona State University, who reviewed the inventory list.

The chemicals at the property included up to 1 million pounds of 4-methylcyclohexne methanol, which is used to separate bits of rocks and clay from mined coal. Somehow, Tank 396 suffered a one-inch hole in its bottom, allowing the chemical to pool on the ground and somehow go through the dike, contaminating the water.

"It's not like it filled up the whole thing like a bathtub or a swimming pool," Dorsey said.

2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Advertise with us!
Sponsored content